RETURN to the Guiding Principles document:
I have received a copy of the Guiding Principles. Does this mean I am going to get kicked out, or something is going to happen to my home?
ANSWER: No, it does not mean that your housing is at risk. When you read the Guiding Principles, you will notice that they are a promise to preserve our housing and protect public housing residents. Even if a plan does emerge for major renovations or redevelopment of the building where you live, any change would likely be years away. In addition, your lease protects you from being evicted or losing your housing benefits.
Here is what the Guiding Principles ARE:
- A pledge that no resident will lose housing because of redevelopment.
- A commitment to fully inform residents of any possible changes that could affect them, and involve residents deeply in the planning process.
- A promise to provide residents with choices, options, and assistance in the event of any change.
- A framework from which specific plans, if needed, can emerge.
- A declaration that all residents will have the first right-of-return to their site.
Here is what the Guiding Principles ARE NOT:
- A specific plan to redevelop any building (or all of our buildings).
- An indication of any change to your home or apartment, or your public housing benefits.
- An announcement of any financial or other deal with a private partner.
- A signal that residents need to prepare for anything, or do anything (other than become informed and join in the conversation, if they wish).
Why are you doing this?
ANSWER: MPHA’s funding from the federal government is not enough to address the major structural problems across our 6,000 public housing units. We do not want to lose any of this vital housing. So we are beginning a process to explore how we can look beyond federal government funding and preserve our housing for the future. Before this exploring process begins, we wanted to put our values and our commitment to residents in black-and-white–that’s where the Guiding Principles come in.
Are you selling public housing to private developers in order to get rid of low-income tenants?
ANSWER: Absolutely not–in fact, this is exactly the opposite. We pledge to our residents and to the community that every effort and action MPHA will take is about preserving and improving our housing for the low-income people we serve. MPHA does not want to lose a single unit of affordable housing or see a single family lose their housing benefit. Anyone who tells you MPHA is trying to eliminate housing or do anything to harm the people we serve is misleading you, and does not understand our mission statement.
People get nervous when you talk about private investors or developers. If a private investor gets involved, couldn’t they just evict families and raise rents?
ANSWER: No. Our only goal is to preserve affordable housing. Private investors might not always be necessary. And many “private” investors are actually nonprofit organizations that share our affordable housing goals. But it’s true that private, for-profit investors–seeking to benefit from affordable housing tax credits–might play a role in the financial formula that helps us preserve our housing. In most (and maybe all) cases, MPHA would continue to own the land–which gives us a lot of power! In any deal we make, MPHA will negotiate the terms to include protections for tenants against rent hikes and unfavorable changes to the lease. The deals could also include MPHA continuing to manage the property, having the building returning to MPHA ownership after a certain number of years, and language that requires the housing to remain affordable in perpetuity.
I heard this is about “gentrification.” Is it?
ANSWER: This is about protecting MPHA’s properties from gentrification. Gentrification is what happens in the non-public-housing market when affordable neighborhoods, houses, and apartments become too expensive for the people who live there. Although the city or state may be able to pursue policies that slow or prevent it, MPHA cannot control gentrification in the private property market. However, we can control what happens with our own properties! Despite what you might have heard, our goal is to preserve deeply subsidized, affordable housing and do our part to fight against gentrification.
Some people are calling this a “plan.” Does this mean you have a plan in place for all of the buildings? What about my building?
ANSWER: It is not accurate to describe the Guiding Principles as a “plan,” and there is no specific plan for any building at this time. MPHA is facing greatly increased capital needs, with significant and growing shortfalls in its funding. We do have an overall goal–preserving our housing–and knowledge of the tools we might use to get there (such as issuing bonds, or partnering with investors who benefit from low-income housing tax credits). While the Guiding Principles present a framework and offer guidance for how the MPHA might address the challenges we face, we do not have a specific plan for any building (much less a plan for every building).
As of the summer of 2017–and for the foreseeable future–we will be doing research and analysis. Out of this process, we will develop a better understanding of the priorities and possibilities for the many and varied buildings we own. Only then would we begin, in consultation with residents, to formulate specific plans related to our developments.
Is every building going to have major work done in the coming years?
ANSWER: It is still too early to say. Through its Capital Fund Program, MPHA works to identify the most critical needs and use its limited resources to make repairs and improvements. Currently we have over $127 million in immediate needs and this will increase to $510 million in the next 20 years. MPHA receives about $10 million per year from HUD for capital improvements. This discrepancy puts our portfolio at risk. MPHA’s goal is to utilize the framework in the Guiding Principles to raise significant resources in order to be able to make major improvements to our properties over the coming years.
MPHA has 42 highrises and 900 family homes. We expect to find that some buildings need extensive work in the near-term, whereas others are in much better shape. Even if major work were indicated for every building, MPHA would have to phase in the work over many years as it would take a very long time–and an enormous amount of funding–to move through them.
Will people be displaced? And what happens then?
ANSWER: Minimizing displacement is one of our primary goals, declared in the Guiding Principles. MPHA cannot promise that no one will have to move at any point in this process. Current public housing residents whose apartments have been renovated know that it is typically necessary to move to another unit while the work is done. With the significant shortfalls in our funding, we are looking to preserve, improve and renovate for the future across as many of our units as we can, starting with those with the greatest need. In many cases, this may mean a temporary move while the work is completed, and affected residents will always have choices. In many cases, it may be possible to simply move to another unit in the same location (as we complete renovations in stages). No matter what, residents of a building are guaranteed the first right-of-return, and MPHA will pay for relocation assistance (like reimbursement for any moving costs, cable or telephone hook-up fees, etc.).
Here’s one related point worth clarifying: You might have heard that MPHA plans, though this process, to “displace” 26,000 people. Along with the many other reasons this is inaccurate, MPHA does not have 26,000 people living in public housing. Although MPHA serves around 26,000 people with our programs, 17,000 of them are in families with Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8).
Will you ever sell a building?
ANSWER: The only time we would even consider simply turning a building, vacant land, or any of our properties over the private market is if we truly believe MPHA residents will come out ahead in a big way. In the case of housing, this would mean replacing those units with something even better elsewhere, and making absolutely sure every current resident family is fully taken care of. Any decision like this would only happen after extensive discussions and negotiations, with residents engaged at every step. This is our promise, and we expect you to hold us to it.
How much did you confer with residents before your board approved these Guiding Principles?
ANSWER: Residents weighed in on the Guiding Principles through a number of well-publicized meetings over three months. This does not mean the discussion is over; MPHA continues to meet with any resident councils or other groups who wish to discuss the Principles and learn more about our capital reinvestment initiative.
Here is a timeline leading up to approval by our board:
- MPHA created an initial draft of the Guiding Principles in February 2017.
- At the beginning of March, this draft was sent to our Board of Commissioners to notify them that we would be presenting it to residents for review.
- On March 2, the Executive Committee of the Minneapolis Highrise Representative Council (MHRC) first reviewed the draft; the full MHRC board (with representatives of every high-rise building) discussed the draft at its March 16 meeting, with MPHA staff available to answer questions.
- In early March, MPHA posted the draft prominently on its web site, Facebook, and Twitter accounts, and sent the draft out for translation into multiple languages (which were subsequently posted when they arrived a few days later).
- At the same time, in the first week of March, MPHA reached out to the Defend Glendale group to offer a meeting to share and discuss the draft. (Glendale Townhomes is not a high-rise, and so is not a part of the MHRC. There is currently not a functioning resident council at Glendale.)
- On April 12 and 13, MPHA Executive Director Greg Russ presented to the MHRC “Area Meetings.” These are large, well-publicized meetings open to all high-rise residents. They were well-attended, and Mr. Russ answered a large number of resident questions.
- On April 17, Mr. Russ joined a Resident Council meeting at one of our large, downtown Minneapolis buildings (314 Hennepin – “The Atrium”). All building residents were welcome, and the large meeting room was full to capacity. Residents heard Mr. Russ’s presentation, and asked many clarifying questions during the extended meeting. Comments from this meeting were submitted to MHRC, which integrated them into its formal responses.
- On the evening of April 17, Mr. Russ first met with Defend Glendale. The meeting included residents and a number of non-resident attendees. After a number of hours the conversation was still incomplete, and the meeting needed to be continued at a later date.
- On April 26, MPHA’s Resident Advisory Board (RAB) reviewed, discussed, and approved the draft.
- On May 5, Russ returned for a follow-up meeting with Defend Glendale. The group was made aware of their opportunity to submit suggestions or amendments. They declined to do so.
- On May 17, MHRC submitted substantial recommendations, all of which were promptly incorporated into the draft. MHRC improvements resulted in the replacement, addition, or substantial rewording of approximately seven paragraphs.
- On May 24, prior to the monthly MPHA board meeting, the public housing Tenant Advisory Committee (TAC) discussed with Mr. Russ and then approved the draft of the Guiding Principles that included the MHRC additions.
- Later on May 24, the MPHA Board of Commissioners took up the draft at its regular monthly meeting. The Board made two minor changes to paragraph-order and wording, and approved a final version of the Guiding Principles.
- This version was promptly highlighted on MPHA’s web site and social media, and sent out for translation. Once the translations were received, MPHA delivered a copy in mid-June to all public housing residents.
Last updated June 28, 2017